If I visit five hosting providers websites I get nicely marketed homepages – but this doesn’t tell me how reliable they are, how much downtime I’d suffer or how flexible and helpful they are.
I can research forums and google the company names, but this all takes time – wouldn’t it be nicer if I could regularly see genuine customer feedback? Maybe you get your customers to vote about the quality of the service every month, perhaps in exchange for a discount (regardless of how they vote). All the results are shown in a little ticker on the front page. If the company gets an average 93% positive vote â€“ isnâ€™t that something worth shouting about?
Maybe then I’d go to these five hosting providers and several would have historic results on their homepage. You’d see hiccups when the service went down – Iâ€™d expect to see occasional failures, and Iâ€™d expect to see customers feeling happy very soon after if they were really being looked after.
Good providers wouldn’t be scared of the downside of occasional negative voting â€“ theyâ€™d know that their long-term average was the main selling point. So why donâ€™t we see this on the web?
Orlando Bloom, actually surprisingly, was able to carry the movie as a lead. I was surprised he had the heft to do it, but I agree with the critic who said that the beard helped. He was a man, not a boy.
I like it – cost spammers some money if you don’t like what they’re selling. The model is nice, can be applied to any sort of contact – you attach a ‘bounty’ to your mail, and if the recipient feels you’re wasting their time then they can claim the bounty, else they leave it. If you don’t trust your audience, you’d give a small bounty if they might claim it, but then as a recipient I see that you think I might take your bounty so I might choose to ignore your mail. You’d have to get it right to make money…spam squashed.
Joel on Software writes about the Wrong interpretation of (the Hungarian) Charles Simonyi’s markup ideas for programming languages. Instead of the mess that Microsoft has put foward in MFC for so long (lspwzwotsit), it turns out he had a much simpler idea. And the idea rocks, it’s just the kind of thing that good programmers find themselves doing (or am I talking baloney?). Twenty years to come full circle – funny how long silly interpretations can last for.
Read my book
Trending Now1“Making Pandas Fly” at EuroPython 2020High Performance Python Book, pydata, Python2Weekish notesData science, Python, Week notes3Weekish notesData science, Python4“Making Pandas Fly” for PyDataAmsterdam 2020Data science, High Performance Python Book, pydata5Weeknote (dtype-diet)Data science, Week notes
TagsAim Api Artificial Intelligence Blog Brighton Conferences Cookbook Demo Ebook Email Emily Face Detection Few Days Google High Performance Iphone Kyran Laptop Linux London Lt Map Natural Language Processing Nbsp Nltk Numpy Optical Character Recognition Pycon Python Python Mailing Python Tutorial Robots Running Santiago Seb Skiff Slides Startups Tweet Tweets Twitter Ubuntu Ups Vimeo Wikipedia